690 So. 2d 537 - Ex Parte Landers’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 368 So. 2d 554 - Sprinkle v. State · Sprinkle v. State · 600 So. 2d 374 - Burks v. State · 54 Ala. App. 729 - Ex parte Bynum · Ex Parte Bynum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In Burks v. State, 600 So.2d 374 (Ala. Cr.App.), on return to remand, 600 So.2d 387 (Ala.Cr.App.1991), this court addressed the issue whether a person accused of a capital offense is entitled to bail when he alleges that the proof was not evident. This court in Burks stated:”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"The petitioner contends that he is entitled to reasonable bail because, he says, the evidence against him is weak. "According to Article I, § 16, Alabama Constitution of 1901, a person charged with an offense defined as capital by statute may be denied bail.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"This court in Burks based its ruling on the Court of Appeals' holding in Livingston v. State, 40 Ala.App. 376 , 116 So.2d 396 (1959), where the court, ruling on the correctness of the trial court's actions in denying bail in a first degree murder case, stated the following:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.