Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

690 So. 2d 734

Albert v. Albert

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-04-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1998

1 state decisions

Relies on 648 So. 2d 177 - Kovar v. Kovar

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-04-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This is an appeal and cross appeal from a judgment of dissolution of marriage. Although the former husband has raised several issues on appeal, we affirm as to all but one — the award of attorney’s fees and costs to the former wife. The equitable distribution of the marital assets left the parties in substantial financial parity. Under these circumstances, it was an abuse of discretion for the trial judge to require the former husband to pay the former wife’s attorney’s fees and costs. Kovar v. Kovar, 648 So.2d 177, 179 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

¶2*735As to the former wife’s cross appeal, having carefully considered the merits, we affirm.

¶3AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

GUNTHER, C.J., and DELL and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
/690/so2d/734 · .json · Public domain