State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2011
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3509
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Ohio v. Roberts · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · Maryland v. Craig
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) anal or vaginal penetration deemed to be without consent of the victim because of (2) the victim's age at the time of the rape.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the child witness would be traumatized, not by the courtroom generally, but by the presence of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the `victim's testimony alone is sufficient to establish the fact of penetration.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Darbonne
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.