Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 690 So. 2d 869 - Acklin v. Acklin

690 So. 2d 869 - Acklin v. Acklin’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2019

10 state decisions

40199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 616 So. 2d 1234 - Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. · 492 So. 2d 1193 - Bergeron v. Bergeron · 441 So. 2d 494 - Carroway v. Carroway · Foy v. Foy · State v. Ourso

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A modification of visitation rights is not so substantial as a change in actual physical custody. Mosely v. Mosely, 499 So.2d 106 (La.App. 1st Cir.1986), writ denied , 505 So.2d 1138 (La.1987), citing Bergeron, supra. As such, a showing that the modification is in the best interest of a child is sufficient. Bennett v. Bennett, 95-152 (La.App. 3d Cir. 5/31/95), 657 So.2d 413 ; Reynier v. Reynier, 545 So.2d 663 (La.App. 5th Cir.1989) ; Mosely, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the continuation of the present custody is so deleterious to the child as to justify a modification of the custody decree, or ... that the harm likely to be caused by a change of environment is substantially outweighed by its advantages to the child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.