690 So. 2d 995 - Johnson v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 285 So. 2d 536 - Broadway v. All-Star Insurance Corporation · 40 So. 2d 24 - Ellzey v. Hardware Mut. Ins. Co. of Minnesota · 668 So. 2d 1368 - Whiddon v. Hutchinson · Hemperly v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. · 257 So. 2d 785 - Harang v. Sparacino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The requirement of the statute that the reason must be given is a requirement that information is to be given to the policy holder. “COMPANY REQUEST” applies to any and all reasons a company cancels a policy. Therefore, “COMPANY REQUEST” is equivalent to no reason as it gives no hint of the real reason and therefore furnishes the policy holder with no more information than had he just received a policy cancellation notice containing no reason.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“No notice of cancellation of a policy to which Subsection B [1] or C of this Section applies shall be effective unless mailed by certified mail or delivered by the insurer to the named insured at least thirty days prior to the effective date of cancellation; however when cancellation is for nonpayment of premium at least ten days notice of cancellation accompanied by the reason therefor shall be given.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.