690 So. 2d 999 - State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2311 (Anti Car Theft Act of 1992)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chapman v. State of California · Sullivan v. Louisiana · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 488 So. 2d 965 - State v. Rosiere
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must be given the broadest possible construction, including any conceivable thing of the slightest value, movable or immovable, corporeal or incorporeal, public or private, and including transportation, telephone and telegraph services, or any other service available for hire. It must be construed in the broad popular sense of the phrase, not necessarily as synonymous with the traditional legal term”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris“In all cases involving shoplifting the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.