Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 690 SW2D 102 - Page v. State

Page v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2015

6 state decisions

301985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barfield v. State · Penagraph v. State · Rumbaugh v. State · Canada v. State · Jordan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial docket sheet reflects a long and confusing list of resets. However, appellant and the state are basically in agreement as to the sequence of events prior to August 1, 1983.”). 4 . The record does not reflect when the search warrant was issued. 5 . Fry contradicted Graham’s testimony at the hearing and denied asking Graham to refrain from filing the Loma Vista charges. 6 . This apparent concession by the State may simply be a misstatement. The State contends that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.