Peacock v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 2016
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Royster v. State · Brasfield v. State · Heredia v. State · Watson v. State · Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he evidence ... shows that the indictment in the second offense ... was filed on March 5, 1976. A judgment of conviction was entered on July 26, 1976. Where there is a final conviction, the court will presume that the offense was committed sometime within the statute of the limitations prior to the filing of the indictment. Juarez v. State, 496 S.W.2d 638 (Tex.Cr. App.1973). The statute of limitations for aggravated assault is three years. Art. 12.01(4). Therefore we may assume that the second offense was committed after March 5, 1973, which is a date after the first offense became final.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Peacock did not testify and offered no evidence in rebuttal to show that the knife was not used as a deadly weapon. 690 S.W.2d at 615 (Emphasis in original opinion).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lawrence v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.