Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 691 A2D 628 - In Re Johnson

In Re Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2016

6 state decisions

20199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weinstein v. Bradford · James Covington v. David W. Harris · Lynch v. United States · In the Matter of Lomax · McClain v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “conclude[d] that ... a voluntary outpatient who meets the statutory criteria for civil commitment may be involuntarily committed as an outpatient, when ... nothing more than conversion of the individual’s outpatient status from voluntary to involuntary [is proposed].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “although we do not decide the matter, there would appear to be room, even under Blair , for a petition to seek involuntary commitment of a voluntary inpatient who no longer is “amenable to voluntary treatment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.