Dunn & Mavis, Inc. v. Nu-Car Driveaway, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
691 F.2d 241 · 1982
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently December 2009 · most notably Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. (1984), Fishman v. Estate of Wirtz (1986)
37 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Colgate & Co. · Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. · Eastman Kodak Co of New York v. Southern Photo Materials Co · Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States · Frey v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does no more than state [its] commercial disappointment at losing [Toyota's] patronage--the recurrent case of the jilted ... supplier who loses a manufacturer's franchise and accuses the manufacturer and the new suitor of attempting to monopolize something.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]ince the complaint does not allege facts suggesting that Chrysler's refusal to deal had any significant anti-competitive effect on the market, there is no rule of reason case alleged.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Chrysler's substitution of one auto transport company for another at its Warren plant does not limit competition in any substantial sense. A contrary decision would limit without reason the normal principle that a buyer is entitled to choose among various sellers who offer competing products or services.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.