United States v. Crowder’s Empirical Analysis
691 F.2d 280 · 1982
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312 · 18 U.S.C. § 2313
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Doyle v. Ohio · Anderson v. Charles · Maglio v. Jago
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Q. Do you recall being interviewed by Agent Sledd on December 9, 1980? A. Yes, I do. Q. Well, did you make this statement to him? “I do not wish to discuss the matter and will stand by my previous statements to the Kentucky State Police”? A. Yes, I did. BY THE COURT: He had- the perfect right to make that statement, ladies and gentlemen, and that is not to be considered as evidence of his guilt. A. I made that statement, If I may say so, on the advice of a previous lawyer that I had had. Q. Your lawyer told you to make that statement? A. That is correct. BY THE COURT: He didn’t have to make any statement. A. (Continuing) Not this lawyer. Trans. 429.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.