Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 691 F.2d 997 - Hills v. Commissioner

Hills v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
August 2012
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2012

11 federal appellate ·

1801982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 105 · 26 U.S.C. § 162 · 26 U.S.C. § 165 · 26 U.S.C. § 23 · 26 U.S.C. § 24 · 26 U.S.C. § 262

Relies on Bullock v. United States · Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization · Mohasco Corp. v. Silver · Cruz v. Hauck · Parham v. Cortese

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not compensated for by insurance or otherwise”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““13. See J. Seidman, Seidman’s Legislative History of Federal Income Tax Laws, 1938-1961, at 1018 (1938). There was no Finance Committee report for this bill. See also Comment, Theft Loss Deductions as Relief for the Small Investor, 1978 Duke L.J. 849 , 860-61 & nn. 67, 68 (discussing and citing sources for limited legislative history of § 165(c)(3)).””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[t]he disposition the Commissioner favore[d] in this case would deny a section 165 deduction any time a loss is covered by insurance,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.