Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 691 F.3d 893 - United States v. Freeman

United States v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

691 F.3d 893 · 2012

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
February 2025
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 21 U.S.C. § 851 (§ 411 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Maryland v. Pringle · Devenpeck v. Alford · Wyoming v. Sandra Houghton · Block v. Rutherford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"only because the witness may have been impeached by certain discrepancies in [her] story, by prior inconsistent statements, or by the existence of a motive to provide evidence favorable to the government." To find a witness's testimony to be incredible as a matter of law, it must have been "physically impossible for the witness to have observed that which he claims occurred, or impossible under the laws of nature for the occurrence to have taken place at all."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he police had credible information about Freeman's drug-trafficking habits from the cooperating informants, and his activities just prior to his arrest coincided perfectly with the details of the undercover operation, thus supplying probable cause to arrest despite the fact that no drugs were found in the search during the stop.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the police on the scene had plenty of information to give them probable cause to believe that [the defendant] had committed the crime,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.