Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 691 F. Supp. 424 - Combs v. Leishman

691 F. Supp. 424 - Combs v. Leishman’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
September 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2008

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

80198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 4201 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 4202 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1383 (§ 4203 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1401 (§ 4221 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co. · Iam National Pension Fund Benefit Plan v. Stockton Tri Industries · Iam National Pension Fund Plan Benefits v. Clinton Engines Corporation Iam National Pension Fund Benefit Plan a · Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Corporation · Grand Union Company v. Food Employers Labor Relations Association & Grand Union Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “), as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.