Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 691 N.E.2d 1232 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2000
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. Dixon · Grady v. Corbin · Illinois v. Vitale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “analysis of the federal double jeopardy clause first articulated in Blockburger . This court, in deciding whether, in the wake of Dixon , Indiana should adopt its own double jeopardy analysis, has held that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “nothing in the text of the Indiana Constitution ... supports [the defendant's] contention that Indiana requires a separate analysis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.