Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 691 SE2D 685 - In Re Belk

In Re Belk’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Matter of Montgomery · State v. Fie · In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 44, Martin · In re Tucker · In Re Badgett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hile a district court judge must respect the Chief District Court Judge's duties and authority, the nature of the relationship between coworkers may at times produce episodes of contention, disagreement, and frustration ... [and] discipline is not normally imposed for a single incident of improper behavior exhibited towards a coworker.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “be patient, dignified and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers and others with whom the judge deals in the judge's official capacity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.