Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

691 So. 2d 26

Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-04-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2015

1 state decisions

Relies on 608 So. 2d 90 - Evans v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-04-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Randy Miller (Miller) appeals his conviction and sentence for robbery with a firearm, committed on August 19, 1995, in Escambia County. The trial judge sentenced Miller to prison for two hundred months, including three mandatory years, followed by probation for five years. We affirm without discussion Miller’s judgment of guilt.

¶2We also affirm Miller’s sentence, with the exception of that portion of the sentence and probation order requiring Miller to “maintain full-time gainful employment.” It is error to require a probationer to maintain full-time employment. Evans v. State, 608 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The trial court on remand may modify this provision to require Miller to “maintain or actively seek gainful employment.” Id. at 91.

¶3We accordingly affirm Miller’s judgment and sentence, except for that portion of the order of probation that contravenes Evans. We remand for correction in this regard consistent with Evans. AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
/691/so2d/26 · .json · Public domain