¶1Affirmed. Harmon v. State, 527 So.2d 182 (Fla.1988); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986); Rogers v. State, No. 95-2248, 689 So.2d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); State v. Marshall, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D1865, — So.2d - [1996 WL 460696] (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), rev. granted, 689 So.2d 1072 (Fla. 1996); State v. Burns, 661 So.2d 842 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), rev. dismissed 676 So.2d 1366 (Fla.1996); State v. Riley, 617 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); State v. Kester, 612 So.2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); McIntosh v. State, 532 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).
691 So. 2d 31
Eckstrom v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 2, 1997
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-04-02
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 689 So. 2d 1066 - State v. Hunter · 527 So. 2d 182 - Harmon v. State
Decided 1997-04-02