691 So. 2d 34 - Loomis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2012
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 627 So. 2d 1170 - Anderson v. State · Hoffman v. State · 662 So. 2d 1350 - Flores v. State · 684 So. 2d 241 - McGee v. State · Jenkins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is not our intention to increase the burden placed on trial courts by rule 3.850 and its strict requirements. Nevertheless, the rule’s procedural mandates ... cannot be circumvented in the way that the trial court attempted to do so in this case. Accordingly, we have no alternative but to reverse and remand for the entry of a procedurally proper order which strictly complies with the requirements of the rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.