Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

691 So. 2d 591

Grandison v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-04-16

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2012

2 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-04-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MICKLE, Judge.

¶1Appellant challenges his judgment and sentence for one count of possession of cocaine. Appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the judgment and sentence, but reverse and remand for correction of a scrivener’s error contained in the written judgment. The *592written judgment indicates that appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to sell, a second-degree felony in violation of section 893.18(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). However, appellant was convicted of simple possession of cocaine, a third-degree felony, in violation of section 893.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). The trial court is directed to correct the written judgment accordingly.

¶2AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
/691/so2d/591 · .json · Public domain