¶1Mr. Hurst challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress, having reserved the right to appeal that denial when he pleaded no contest to the charge of possession of cocaine. He also challenges Condition (18) of his probation because it was not orally imposed.
¶2We affirm on the suppression issue but strike Condition (18) of Mr. Hurst’s probation. The State offers no objection to the striking of the probation condition, without remand.
¶3We strike probation Condition (18) and otherwise affirm.