Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 691 SW2D 310 - Erslon v. Cusumano

Erslon v. Cusumano’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2010

12 state decisions

801985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weir Ex Rel. Weir v. Brune · Best v. Schoemehl · Shell v. Shell · Lipton Realty, Inc. v. St. Louis Housing Authority · Klippel v. Watkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 74.01(b) provides an exception to this finality rule for cases with multiple claims. A trial court may enter judgment on less than all claims and certify that there is no just reason for delay. The designation by a trial court that its order is final and appealable is not conclusive. It is the content, substance, and effect of the order that determines finality and appealability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.