Martin v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
692 F.2d 112 · 1982
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably Norman v. Housing Authority of Montgomery (1988), Gillis v. United States Department of Health & Human Services (1985)
28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation · Goldsboro Christian Schools, Inc. v. United States · Jetco Electronic Industries, Inc. v. Gardiner · Tose 80-2123 v. First Pennsylvania Bank Na
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall have no effect. A new notice of appeal must be filed within the prescribed time measured from the entry of the order disposing of the motion....”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“FRAP 4(a)(4) renders ineffective a notice of appeal filed during the pendency of specified posttrial motions, including a motion for a new trial, and requires that a new notice of appeal be filed after the posttrial motion is disposed of.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bolden v. Odum“there is an exception to the requirements of Rule 54(b) that allows the separate appeal of a nonfinal judgment where a subsequent judgment of the district court effectively terminates the litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.