Ressler v. Pierce’s Empirical Analysis
692 F.2d 1212 · 1982
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2019 · most notably Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation Survivors (1985), Powderly v. Schweiker (1983)
26 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1715L (Emergency Low Income Housing Preservation Act of 1987) · 12 U.S.C. § 1715Z · 42 U.S.C. § 1437F · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Richardson v. Perales · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Goldberg v. Kelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“by virtue of [an applicant's] membership in a class of individuals whom the Section 8 program was intended to benefit.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“closely circumscribe an owner's discretion”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.