United States v. Rox’s Empirical Analysis
692 F.2d 453 · 1982
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2017
9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Opper v. United States · Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n · United States v. Reliable Transfer Co. · Hampton v. United States · United States v. Rabbitt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) concerning McAlpin. 11 48 The government argument is threefold: (1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for severance; (2) the defendants have failed to show substantial prejudice by the admission of the other acts evidence pertaining to McAlpin; and (3) even if there was error in the lower court, it was harmless error in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt. According to the government, the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A defendant must move for severance based on misjoinder before trial or waive the objection. Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(5).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A defendant is prejudiced if the jury would be unable to keep the evidence from each offense separate and unable to render a fair and impartial verdict on each offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Abel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.