Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 692 F.2d 584 - United States v. Kessler

United States v. Kessler’s Empirical Analysis

692 F.2d 584 · 1982

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
5
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 5 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably United States v. Bagley (1985), United States v. Jones (1996)

24 federal appellate · 5 district · 11 state decisions

2901982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3731

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Brower v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification,”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The use of handcuffs or other indicia of custody will not invalidate a show-up, at least where necessary for the prompt and orderly presentation of the suspect, consistent with protection of the officers and witnesses.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We are content to rely upon the good sense and judgment of American juries, for evidence with some element of untrustworthiness is customary grist for the jury mill.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.