Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 692 F.2d 823 - United States v. Myers

United States v. Myers’s Empirical Analysis

692 F.2d 823 · 1982

Citation profile

196
cited by 196 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

143 federal appellate · 8 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 196 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2020 · most notably United States v. Ortiz (1986), United States v. McLernon (1984)

143 federal appellate · 8 district · 12 state decisions — followed in 11 states

99019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 202 · 18 U.S.C. § 203 · 18 U.S.C. § 205 · 18 U.S.C. § 207 · 18 U.S.C. § 210 · 18 U.S.C. § 214

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Stovall v. Denno · Manson v. Brathwaite · United States v. Nixon · United States v. O'Brien

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 196 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “use of dishonest and deceitful informants”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “in which key events occur in one district, but the prosecution, preferring trial elsewhere, lures a defendant to a distant district for some minor event simply to establish venue,” but finding that standard inapplicable in that case). Indeed, in a more recent case, the Second Circuit noted that”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “(T)he defense of entrapment is not established simply because government agents `afford opportunities or facilities for the commission of the offense', Sorrells v. United States, supra , 287 U.S. [435] at 441, 53 S.Ct. [210] at 212 [ 77 L.Ed. 413 ] or engage in `deceit', United States v. Russell , 411 U.S. 423 , 435-36 , 93 S.Ct. 1637 , 1644-45 , 36 L.Ed.2d 366 (1973). The legal defense of entrapment is not established whenever a defendant is caught by a ruse.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.