Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 692 F.2d 871 - Rivers v. Schweiker

Rivers v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

692 F.2d 871 · 1982

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
July 1995
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1383 (§ 1631 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist · Rothstein v. Wyman · Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,186 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and Daniel G. Schuman · Kaynard v. Mego Corp. · Texas v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Because the determination of SSI eligibility by the [Social Security Administration] often takes more than one year, many States ... have voluntarily agreed to provide cash assistance payments to individuals during the period between the filing of an SSI application and the receipt of initial SSI benefits. Fearful that states would not provide interim relief without some guarantee of reimbursement, Congress in 1974 provided a mechanism called the Interim Cash Reimbursement Program (IAR), 42 U.S.C. § 1383 (g) (Supp.1982), whereby states could recoup interim assistance benefits paid to SSI applicants. To take advantage of the IAR, a state must (1) enter into a formal reimbursement agreement with the Federal [Department of Health and Human Services], and (2) obtain written authorization from the individual applying for SSI benefits permitting the Federal [Department] to withhold the individual’s initial SSI check and pay to the state an amount sufficient to reimburse for interim assistance provided the individual.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] state must (1) enter into a formal reimbursement agreement with [HHS], and (2) obtain written authorization from the individual applying for SSI benefits permitting [HHS] to withhold the individual’s initial SSI check and pay to the state an amount sufficient to reimburse for interim assistance provided to the individual, 42 U.S.C. § 1383 (g)(1)____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.