Banks v. Workman’s Empirical Analysis
692 F.3d 1133 · 2012
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Coleman v. Thompson · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Burks v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a state procedural rule must be 'strictly or regularly followed' and applied 'evenhandedly to all similar claims.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A state procedural rule is independent if it relies on state law, rather than federal law, as the basis for the decision.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because § 1089 is purely a state law rule, we have held that Oklahoma decisions resting entirely upon § 1089(D)(8) are independent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pavatt v. Royal
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.