Werth v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Santobello ” claim. The difference is Santobello provides further edification when the prosecutor’s misconduct is the source of the constitutional infirmity. This syllogism readily explains why the Report and Recommendation begins its discussion section with Boykin. This is so, in light of the fact that King's § 2254 petition was almost identical to his Brief in Support of his Motion to Withdraw his Guilty Plea, because King’s assertions at the state level are necessarily rooted in Boy-kin. 5 . I am satisfied that King's claim was”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. King v. Berghuis

2. “a guilty plea represents a break in the chain of events which has preceded it in the criminal process. When a criminal defendant has solemnly admitted in open court that he is in fact guilty of the offense with which he is charged, he may not thereafter raise independent claims relating to the deprivation of constitutional rights that occurred prior to the entry of the guilty plea.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 29 F. Supp. 3d 1059 - Enyart v. Coleman

3. “absent some indication or Michigan procedural principle to the contrary, we must presume that an unexplained summary order is an adjudication on the merits for AEDPA purposes”). 6 . Much of King’s appellate brief supports his argument that the state court’s decision was”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. King v. Berghuis