Tebbens v. Mushol’s Empirical Analysis
692 F.3d 807 · 2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on United States v. Mendenhall · Malley v. Briggs · Whren v. United States · Hunter v. Bryant · Brosseau v. Haugen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Zima’s own testimony would make the most casual observer incredulous over what, in his opinion, constitutes a violation of an order of protection,” (Resp. at 8), the reasonableness of an officer’s actions does not depend on his subjective motivations. “Rather, the existence of probable cause depends on whether the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dakhlallah v. Zima“Subjective intentions play no role in ordinary, probable-cause Fourth Amendment analysis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Black v. Clarke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.