692 F. Supp. 2d 396 - Almengor v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on United States v. O'Brien · Epperson v. Arkansas · Books Inc Mjm Mjm Exhibitors Inc v. J Stern H J I · Field Day, LLC v. County of Suffolk · Southworth v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The essence of an ‘as applied’ challenge ... is a claim that the manner in which a statute or regulation was applied to a plaintiff in particular circumstances violated the Constitution, as for example where a facially valid statute was applied to a plaintiff in a discriminatory fashion based on animus toward the plaintiff's First Amendment protected views or activities.”). . An Equal Protection selective enforcement claim requires a showing that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.