Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 692 N.E.2d 485 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2015

13 state decisions

70199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Braxton v. State · Bryce v. State · Gee v. State · Patterson v. State · Monday v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence must be presented from which the trial judge could reasonably conclude that the arrest was appropriate and that there is probable cause to believe the defendant violated a criminal law before the revocation may be sustained. The record before us is devoid of evidence regarding the circumstances leading to Tillberry's arrest for possession of marijuana; thus, there is no evidence from which the trial court could have found probable cause to believe Tillberry committed a crime while on probation. Because there is insufficient evidence to support such a finding, revocation on that basis was error.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When reviewing a trial court's decision to order a defendant's previously suspended sentence to be executed after revoking probation, we will not review the propriety of an original sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “no further evidence of a positive screen for cocaine, including the test results of the drug screen ... `cocaine' was never specifically mentioned during the hearing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.