Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 692 NW2D 463 - State v. Petschl

State v. Petschl’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Teague v. Lane · Griffith v. Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an appellant’s prior conviction for a crime involving injury to a victim alone may be sufficient to justify an upward durational departure. State v. Peake, 366 N.W.2d 299, 301 (Minn.1985). “This is so because repeated crimes against persons pose a greater threat to society than repeated property crimes.” State v. Larson, 379 N.W.2d 165, 167 (Minn. App.1985).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.