In Re TB’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 127 N.C. App. 505 - Matter of Helms · 169 N.C. App. 423 - In Re PM · Finch v. City of Durham · 174 N.C. App. 517 - In Re EC · In Re DJD
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] juvenile in need of assistance or placement because ... the juvenile's parent, guardian, or custodian is unable to provide for the juvenile's care or supervision and lacks an appropriate alternative child care arrangement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In determining whether a juvenile is dependent, the trial court must address both (1) the parent's ability to provide care or supervision, and (2) the availability to the parent of alternative child care arrangements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Findings of fact addressing both prongs must be made before a juvenile may be adjudicated as dependent, and the court's failure to make these findings will result in reversal of the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.