¶1The order requiring restitution under review is reversed because the “appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere based in part on the agreement that no restitution would be imposed. See Hunt v. State, 613 So.2d 893 (Fla.1992).” Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 605, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
692 So. 2d 1005
Montina v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 7, 1997
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-05-07
Relies on Hunt v. State · Taylor v. State
Decided 1997-05-07