Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 692 SO2D 1014 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2012

9 state decisions

50199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on LeDuc v. Florida · Brockett v. Spokane Arcades Inc · Straight v. State · 570 So. 2d 925 - Czubak v. State · 366 So. 2d 745 - Salvatore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the danger that the jury will take the bad character or propensity to crime thus demonstrated as evidence of guilt of the crime charged.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “that the price of such zeal is a reversal, with its attendant costs and burdens to the people of Florida.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the defendant had `gotten himself in trouble in Miami' when there was no evidence to that effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.