Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 692 SO2D 1019 - In Re Marullo

In Re Marullo’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably 705 So. 2d 172 - In Re Quirk (1997), 823 So. 2d 325 - In Re Hunter (2002)

38 state decisions

280199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc. · 549 So. 2d 259 - In Re Chaisson · 654 So. 2d 687 - In Re Decuir · In Re Huckaby · 403 So. 2d 35 - In Re Wilkes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the primary purpose of the Code of Judicial Conduct is to protect the public rather than to discipline a judge.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he charge or charges against a judge must be proved by clear and convincing evidence before the court may censure, suspend with or without salary, remove from office or involuntarily retire a judge.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A judge shall not allow family, social, political, or other relationships to influence judicial conduct or judgment. A judge shall not lend the prestige of judicial office to advance the private interest of the judge or others; nor shall a judge convey or permit others to convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence the judge ...”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.