Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 692 So. 2d 199 - Martinez v. State

692 So. 2d 199 - Martinez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2014

18 state decisions

140199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 559 So. 2d 187 - State v. Law · 591 So. 2d 930 - Karchesky v. State · 371 So. 2d 1024 - McCreary v. State · 509 So. 2d 1088 - Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure re Sentencing Guidelines (Rules 3.701 & 3.988) · 553 So. 2d 323 - In the Interest of W.E.B. v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a recommended sentence under the guidelines exceeds the maximum sentence otherwise authorized by s. 775.082, the sentence recommended under the guidelines must be imposed absent a departure.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"If a recommended sentence under the guidelines exceeds the maximum sentence otherwise authorized by s. 775.082, the sentence under the guidelines must be imposed, absent a departure."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he physical injury or death suffered by a person as a direct result of the primary offense, ... which is pending before the court for sentencing at the time of the primary offense. (emphasis supplied)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.