Hoffman v. Dickerson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 2, 1997

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-05-02

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2004

2 state decisions

Relies on Domanico v. State · 649 So. 2d 346 - Rose v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-05-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The petition for writ of certiorari before this court seeks review of an order denying a motion to consolidate two eases below.

¶2The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed because this court does not have jurisdiction. The petition was filed more than thirty days after the entry of the order denying consolidation. A motion for rehearing directed to an interlocutory order is unauthorized and does not toll the time for the filing of a petition for certiorari. Shelnutt v. Citrus County, 660 So.2d 393 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Coldwell Banker Commercial v. Wightman, 649 So.2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

¶3PETITION DISMISSED.

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.