Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 692 So. 2d 6 - Motton v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

692 So. 2d 6 - Motton v. Lockheed Martin Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1446

Relies on Weems v. Louis Dreyfus Corp. · Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Rub · 583 So. 2d 97 - Bryant v. Pierson · Kaplan v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · 593 So. 2d 727 - Heim v. Chevron USA, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The intent of 28 U.8.C.A. § 1446 is to prevent state and federal courts from sharing jurisdiction over a case and thus avoid jurisdictional conflicts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.