Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 692 SO2D 684 - TEXACO INC. v. Foreman

TEXACO INC. v. Foreman’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2004
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 657 So. 2d 449 - Comeaux v. Sam Broussard Trucking · 640 So. 2d 788 - Fusilier v. Slick Const. Co. · Marcantel v. St. Patrick Hospital · Augustine v. Paul Wall Truck Line, Inc. · 635 So. 2d 570 - Dugas v. Rosary House

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Texaco and Cigna contend that pursuant to La.R.S. 23:1223, Foreman is entitled to 148 weeks of SEB from July 1996 rather than the 520 weeks awarded by the hearing officer. We agree. La.R.S. 23:1223(B) provides that when TTD benefits have been paid, the amount of these benefits shall be deducted from any SEB awarded. Prior to the 1989 amendment to La.R.S. 23:1223 (which became effective January 1, 1990), the statute did not provide for such a deduction from SEB. Since Foreman has received 372 weeks of TTD benefits from January 1990 through July 1996, he may be entitled to a maximum of an additional 148 weeks of SEB rather than the 520 weeks awarded by the hearing officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.