Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

692 So. 2d 888

Docket No. 87331.

State v. Guthrie

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Steve GUTHRIE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 1, 1997.

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1997-05-01

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 2003

5 state decisions

Relies on 690 So. 2d 581 - Sapp v. State · 666 So. 2d 562 - State v. Guthrie · Cook v. Bill Royal Construction Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-05-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General and John M. Klawikofsky, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa; and Earl Moreland, State Attorney and Peter J. Lombardo, Assistant State Attorney, Sarasota, for Petitioner.

¶2James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, for Respondent.

¶3*889 PER CURIAM.

¶4We have for review the opinion in State v. Guthrie,666 So.2d 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), which certified conflict with the opinion in Sapp v. State,660 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

¶5This Court recently approved Sapp and held that an accused may not effectively invoke the right to counsel under the Fifth Amendment of the federal constitution or article I, section 9 of the Florida Constitution until custodial interrogation has begun or is imminent. Sapp v. State,690 So.2d 581 (Fla. 1997). We therefore quash the decision of the district court below and remand for further proceedings.

¶6It is so ordered.

¶7OVERTON, GRIMES, HARDING and WELLS, JJ., concur.

¶8KOGAN, C.J., and SHAW and ANSTEAD, JJ., dissent.

/692/so2d/888 · .json · Public domain