Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 692 S.W.2d 463 - Kish v. Van Note

Kish v. Van Note’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
3
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 62 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp. (1997), Birchfield v. Texarkana Memorial Hospital (1987)

6 federal appellate · 62 state decisions

3401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas))

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. American Transfer & Storage Co. · Smith v. Baldwin · Woo v. Great Southwestern Acceptance Corp. · Butler v. Joseph's Wine Shop, Inc. · Evans v. American Publishing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The DTPA embraces this concept by permitting the injured consumer to recover the greatest amount of actual damages alleged and factually established to have been caused by the deceptive practice, including related and reasonably necessary expenses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The provisions of this subchapter are not exclusive. The remedies provided in this subchapter are in addition to any other procedures or remedies provided for in any other law; provided, however, that no recovery shall be permitted under both this subchapter and another law of both actual damages and penalties for the same act or practice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Neither American [Centennial Insurance Company] nor the bank [Bank of Dallas] violated the Deceptive Trade Practices Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.