Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 692 SW2D 86 - Lowry v. State

Lowry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2008

12 state decisions

90198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Brazos River Authority v. City of Graham · Crocker v. State · Ex Parte Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the instant case, § 25.05 requires that, as an element of the offense, the State must prove the defendant’s ability to provide support. Subsection (f) then requires the defendant to prove his inability to provide support as an affirmative defense. Despite the statute’s use of the term “‘affirmative defense,’” § 25.05(f) serves to shift to the defendant the burden of disproving an element of the offense, thereby depriving the defendant of his right of due process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““(a) An individual commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly fails to provide support that he can provide and that he was legally obligated to provide for his children younger than 18 years, or for his spouse who is in needy circumstances. (f) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that the actor could not provide the support that he was legally obligated to provide.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.