United States v. Dill’s Empirical Analysis
693 F.2d 1012 · 1982
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 11 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Bruton v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico · Delli Paoli v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Disparity in the quantity and quality of evidence does not justify severance, United States v. Dill, 693 F.2d 1012, 1014 (10th Cir.1982), “the fact that the prosecution may have a stronger case against one defendant than against a co-defendant does not entitle either defendant to a separate trial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]hen two or more people commit a criminal act and are later jointly indicted, they can usually expect to be tried together.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.