Ariel US v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
693 F.2d 1058 · 1982
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc. (1986), Truswal Systems Corp. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc. (1987)
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Republic Gear Co. v. Borg-Warner Corp. · Premium Service Corporation v. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company, George A. Scott · Horizons Titanium Corp. v. Norton Co. · National Life Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. · Dart Industries Company Inc v. Westwood Chemical Company Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A resident of the district in which the deposition is to be taken may be required to attend an examination only in the county wherein he resides or is employed or transacts his business in person, or at such other convenient place as is fixed by an order of court. A nonresident of the district may be required to attend only in the county wherein he is served with a subpoena, or within 40 miles from the place of service, or at such other convenient place as is fixed by an order of court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“no other means of effectively obtaining review”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““[E]ven positing that this court has personal jurisdiction ..., it is unreasonable to assume that these appellants’ local offices ‘control’ all documents kept at their respective corporate headquarters____ In the absence of such control, therefore, even the existence of personal jurisdiction in this court is insufficient to create jurisdiction over the documents which are outside of the district.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.