Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 693 F.2d 13 - Dankese v. Defense Logistics Agency

Dankese v. Defense Logistics Agency’s Empirical Analysis

693 F.2d 13 · 1982

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
3
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 9 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably Mathewson Corp. v. Allied Marine Industries, Inc. (1987), Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Applied Computer Sciences, Inc. (1992)

20 federal appellate · 9 district · 4 state decisions

2001982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)

Relies on Teodore Dorotee Autera v. Manuel Dudley Robinson, Anthony C. Autera v. Manuel Dudley Robinson · Joseph Kukla and Donna Kukla, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenor v. National Distillers Products Company v. Penn Central Transportation Co., Third-Party · Warner v. Rossignol · Pagan v. American Airlines, Inc. · Millner v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant is not left remediless. The policy of favoring settlement agreements as a means of avoiding costly and time consuming litigation would scarcely be furthered by leaving a party without recourse when the other party fails to perform according to the terms of the agreement. It is well established, therefore, that a trial court retains an inherent power to supervise and enforce settlement agreements entered into by parties to an action pending before the court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Whether the court may summarily enforce such an agreement or should conduct an evidentiary hearing on the disputed issues depends upon the nature of the dispute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This case presents a not unfamiliar situation in which the relief appellant apparently wanted and the relief he asked for were not the same.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.