Stauffer v. Califano’s Empirical Analysis
693 F.2d 306 · 1982
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably Purter v. Heckler (1985), Penner v. Schweiker (1983)
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Califano v. Sanders · Rice v. Norman Williams Co. · Bradley v. J. F. Batte & Sons of Richmond, Inc. · McGowen v. Harris · Parker v. Califano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which [the claimant] was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.