Stickney v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
693 F.2d 563 · 1982
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2008
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292
Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · 102 S. Ct. 969 - United States v. Security Industrial Bank · United States v. Security Industrial Bank · 276 So. 2d 309 - Jagers v. Royal Indemnity Company · 339 So. 2d 731 - Seaton v. Kelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) The needs of the interstate system; (b) The relevant policies of the forum; (c) The relevant policies of other interested states and the relevant interests of those states in the determination of the particular issue; (d) The protection of justified expectations; (e) The basic policies underlying the particular field of law; (f) Certainty, predictability and uniformity of result; and (g) Ease in the determination and application of the law to be applied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]t was reasonable to anticipate that he would be using Louisiana's highways for an extended period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gates v. Claret
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.